In a Kabbalistic meditation on lighting Chanukah Menorah, the Arizal links the menorah lights with a supernal river (see Candle on the River). The Arizal’s principal disciple, Rabbi Chaim Vital, writes:
One should meditate on the idea that the initials of the words “…l‘hadleek ner Chanukah [to light the Chanukah candle] are the holy name called “Nachal.”
Shaar HaKavanot, Inyan Chanukah
The first letters of the words “l‘hadleek ner Chanukah” are three letters, Lamed (L), Nun (N), and Chet (Ch). Rearranged, these letters spell the word NaChaL, that is, a stream or a small river. As I wrote in my essays, “On the Nature of Time and the Age of the Universe,” and “Joseph—the Master of Time,” a river has been the metaphor for time across many cultures. Does this Kabbalistic meditation hints at a connection between Chanukah lights and time? I think so. Indeed, Rabbi Chaim Vital continues:
…[the river] that emanates from the initials of the words ‘notzer chesed l’alafim—He preserves kindness for two-thousand [years]…
Exodus 34:6-7
And again, the initial letters of the words notzer chesed l‘alefim spell nachal, i.e., a “stream.” The verse above is, of course, a fragment from the Thirteen Attribute of Mercy. This phrase makes an explicit reference to time—“for two thousand [years].” This may be one reason, why it is customary to recite the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy as a part of the Tashlich prayer at a river or a stream in the afternoon of Jewish New Year, Rosh HaShanah.
The connection between Chanukah and a river is further amplified by the fact that the numerical value (gematriah) of the word Chanukah is 89: Chet (8) + Nun (50) + Vav (6) + Kaf (20) + Heh (5) = 89. The gematria of nachal (stream) is: Nun (50) + Chet (8) + Lamed (30) = 88, plus 1 (kollel for the word itself) equals to 89 as well.
If Chanukah lights are reminiscent of a stream or a river, which is a symbol of time, what can Chanukah teach us about time?
In physics, time is thought to be linked to entropy—the measure of disorder. Entropy is essentially the number of microstates, in which the system can be found. The main property of entropy is that it always increases [in closed systems] with time. This rule is known as the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
According to Hillel, we light the menorah in ascending order—one light on the first night, two lights on the second night, etc. According to Shammai, the menorah should be lit in descending order—eight lights on the first night, seven lights on the second night, etc. On a simple level, both methods are counting time by linking it with the notion of order—Hillel counts the entropy (the measure of disorder), which increases with time, whereas, Shammai counts the order itself, which is the inverse of entropy, and which decreases with time.
On a deeper level, these two opinions of the sages of the Mishnah may be hinting at the unique properties of time.
Since the publication of the Special Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein in 1905, space and time became inextricably intertwined. This led Einstein’s mathematics professor, Hermann Minkowski to combine space and time into a four-dimensional spacetime continuum—die Welt, as Minkowski called it in German. However, his innovation was a mixed blessing. While making the special theory of relativity mathematically more elegant, it obfuscated the unique properties of time that separate it from space.
Indeed, whereas space is static, time always flows. This ceaseless flow of time is called time-flux. So far, we have no explanation for the time-flux in physics.
There is another difference: whereas space is isotropic, i.e., physical properties are uniform in each direction, time is decisively anisotropic and only flows in one direction. This is called the arrow of time. It seems to me that the opinions of Hillel and Shammai as to the order of lighting Chanukah lights may be hinting at these two unique properties of time.
According to Hillel, on the first night, we kindle one light; on the second night, we kindle two lights, etc. This ascending order hints at the time-flux and the arrow of time, which only flows in one direction.
Many physicists believe that the arrow of time, which only flows in one direction, seems to be rooted in thermodynamics. All fundamental laws of physics (except for the Second Law of Thermodynamics) are symmetric in time. In mechanics, theoretically, you can reverse the direction of time, and we wouldn’t notice a difference. For example, if we make a movie of a collision of two billiard balls, whether we run the projector forward or backward, the resulting movie would not appear to us unusual or violate any law of nature—we would not be able to say, which movie is real. However, if we film any thermodynamic process and run the movie backward, we will immediately protest—the scrambled eggs can never be unscrambled, and the spilled milk cannot be unspilled. This is because the entropy—the measure of chaos—must always increase; i.e., every system evolves from being more organized into a less organized state. (This is so simply because there are many more random states than ordered states, which makes it much more probable that the system will evolve in the direction of a random state because there are so many of them.)
Let’s pause for a moment and consider the Universe as a whole. This moment in time, almost 14 billion years after the Big Bang, our Universe is still evolving from the past into the future. That means that whatever the level of the entropy (the measure of disorder) of the Universe is now, it had to be incredibly less entropy 13.8 billion years ago—at the time of the Big Bang—because, since then, the entropy has been continuously increasing. All this means that the Universe came into existence in a highly organized state with minimal entropy. This doesn’t look like a result of an explosion called the Big Bang, which we’d expect to produce a pretty chaotic universe with high entropy. Only a created Universe can come into existence in a highly organized state pointing at the Creator.
According to Shammai, we start with the menorah in a highly ordered state – with all eight lights arranged on the menorah in order. From then on, we go from the most ordered state to a less ordered state with only seven lights, and then six lights, etc. On a simple level (peshat), the diminishing number of lights symbolizes the fact that as some of the oil in the Temple menorah has burned out (increasing the entropy), there was less oil left (less order). On a deeper level, the opinion of the school of Shammai may be viewed as an allegory of the most ordered state of the Universe at the dawn of Creation, pointing to the existence of the purposeful Creator, who created the Universe with a purpose and order.
The Targum on the 25th word of the Torah is “linhura” for light. “Light” or “Ohr” is the 25th word (famous allusion to Chanukah). I always found it interesting that in Aramaic the name for light is similiar to the root of the Hebrew word for river or “Nahar”. In light of this article (pun intended) there is clearly a correlation. Now let’s also discuss whether light is a wave, particle, or a river of both according to Targum! ;) I’ll let the Professor take it from here…
Excellent! Kol hakavod!
If we follow the river farther it leads us into the state of entropy where it is no longer a river but a muddled mess of rivers creating a larger body of water. Entropy works there to to separate the water from itself into a form no longer even recognizable as water even to itself as it floats away into the air. The basic identity of water is still there, however, and it reorganizes itself as clouds, rain, and eventually the river again. If the river analogy holds true with time and light as well, it would seem to indicate there is a finite effect of entropy where time, and light, naturally reform themselves into what we view as a new or different time and light. We are seeing one half of an oscillation and assuming it is the entirety. Perhaps the ascending and descending of the Tree is seeing both halves of the oscillation and working within them to make change happen. Changes made in one half would be reflected in the other.